At Specraza.com, we understand that our readers’ trust is our greatest asset. Accuracy, fairness, and balance form the foundation of that trust. We are fully committed to maintaining the highest standards of factual reporting across all our content.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
We define “due accuracy” as not only meeting established journalistic standards but also ensuring our audience’s confidence in our reporting. In pursuing accuracy, we consider several factors—such as subject matter, information type, and reader expectations.
Thorough Investigation
Our team strives to present the most factual and complete version of every story. We actively verify claims, question assumptions, and challenge existing narratives. While some details may remain unclear, we always aim for the most credible account supported by those directly involved.
Contextual Standards
We recognize that fact-checking standards vary by content type. For instance, an article highlighting an NGO’s achievements may require different verification methods than an investigative report.
Guidelines for Ensuring Accuracy
1. Reliable Sources
All information published on Specraza.com is based on credible sources and verifiable data. When direct sources are unavailable, we attribute the information to the platform or organization from which it originated.
2. Verification of Claims
We diligently verify statements, allegations, and facts attributed to public figures or other sources. Any unverified information is clearly labeled or disclaimed.
3. Corrections Policy
If an error is found, it is corrected promptly and transparently. We also inform our readers about the nature of the correction.
4. No Intentional Misinformation
Specraza never deliberately misleads its audience or fabricates facts. Any significant inaccuracies are acknowledged and rectified at the earliest opportunity.
5. Reader Feedback
Each article features a “Suggest a Correction” option, allowing readers to notify us of potential errors or inaccuracies.
Fact-Checking Methodology
Our editorial team is responsible for researching, writing, and fact-checking all published content. Every article goes through a rigorous internal review process, which may include multiple editors, depending on the topic’s complexity or sensitivity.
Engagement with Sources
We reach out to relevant parties involved in or affected by a story to independently verify all claims and ensure fairness.
Enhanced Verification
We continuously refine our fact-checking methods—consulting subject matter experts, using reliable databases, and maintaining transparency in our review process.
Information Sourcing Principles
To maintain the credibility of our content, we adhere to these sourcing principles:
- Verification: Each piece of information is verified by at least two independent sources. Single-source claims must be substantiated through documentation or other evidence.
- Documentation Over Human Sources: We prioritize official records, reports, and documents over anecdotal evidence.
- Survey Transparency: When citing survey data, we disclose collection methods and acknowledge potential margins of error.
- Source Transparency: We aim to use on-the-record sources and provide readers with context about their credibility and relevance.
User-Generated Content (UGC)
Content submitted by users is carefully vetted before publication. We do not accept user-generated information at face value and take the following steps to ensure accuracy:
- Verification: We confirm user-submitted details with individuals, organizations, or other credible references.
- Distinguishing Fact from Rumor: Especially in social media content, we clearly differentiate between verified information and unconfirmed claims.
- Clear Labeling: All user-generated content is labeled accordingly for transparency.
Editorial Responsibility
While Specraza.com may use AI tools to assist in writing or research, all factual verification is performed by our human editorial team. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring accuracy rests with our editors and journalists.